|
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 2:05 p.m.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
M/S/P (Unanimous vote to approve the minutes of the February 15, 2005
meeting with one change—IV, b change “referring” to “referral”
III. ROLE AND STRUCTURE OF EPSC: K. Daar
distributed a second draft of the Educational Plan Subcommittee flowchart
incorporating comments from the previous meeting.
IV. REMEDIATION:
K. Daar reported that the English and non-credit
departments have responded positively to sending representatives to be a part
of a remediation committee. However, the Math department has not yet indicated
that it will participate. D. Beaulieu reported on the District meeting with
district leaders, college presidents, vice-presidents and Academic Senate
presidents with Linda Hagedorn (TRUCCS) and Sylvia Scott-Hayes about
remediation. There is much interest by others in the District in approaching
remediation as a District and investigating issues such as so why many male
students (approximately 40%) in the District do not progress. The DAS will work
with administrators to set up a taskforce on remediation. D. Beaulieu further
stated that the creation of a District committee should not preclude our
efforts to create a committee at East to strive for parallel efforts. D.
Beaulieu and K. Daar will continue to organize a remediation committee on
campus. K. Daar also distributed to the committee different assessment
instruments for Math and English, supplied by S. Morales.
- R. Moyer stated that speakers at the District meeting emphasized how
important it is to have signposts along the way to mark a student’s progress,
and he reminded the committee that the District previously promised money for
an audit system--a valuable tool which has since had the kibosh placed on it.
He suggested that it could be resurrected quickly. R. Moyer also suggested the
committee investigate Pierce College’s automated orientation and to incorporate
into English course syllabi writing assignments requiring students to visit and
write about counseling, financial aid, etc. to further educate students about
ELAC. R. Moyer also stated that the District’s remediation meeting turned to
the nation-wide problem of a widening discrepancy between male and female
enrollments. At ELAC, for example, there are two females to each male enrolled
(at Southwest, 83% of its enrollment are females). R. Moyer suggested creating
syllabi that may appeal to more males.
- D. Beaulieu reported that the TRUCCS survey of 5000 students, approximately
2400 plus women and 1600 plus men, not only showed the gender discrepancy in
enrollment, but also in performance. After four years of continued enrollment
within the District, 34% of women and 43% of the men have made very little
apparent progress. Although East’s performance rates are a bit better than some
other sister colleges, lack of student completion is still a significant issue.
- R. Martinez stated that some of Voc Ed funding, VTEA, is designated for
recruitment. She continued that if ELAC had an audit program, the college would
be able to increase completion rates. In the year 2000, East found that many
students were eligible, or were real close to obtaining a degree. By informing
students of their eligibility, perhaps by purchasing software that will
automatically inform students that they are up for a degree or certificate,
ELAC can increase completion numbers and gain funding from entities, like VTEA,
that look for completion rates.
- C. Rozadilla stated that such software would be wonderful, as students
coming in with other transcripts would not go through the big mystery of
whether or not they are near completion at this college as that information
would be readily available. She stated that Mt. Sac College even indicates
eligibility for a degree or certificate directly on a student’s transcripts.
- R. Moyer stated that biggest problem with the audit system is not ELAC
providing the material for the framework of the assessment, but rather getting
an analysis of this information through an informational system. This requires
the District InfoTech to address this potentially political issue. The District
will say they are busy and that this endeavor is not important. R. Moyer
suggested that if we find the right system, perhaps the politicians amongst us
could get the District to get involved. He further informed the committee that
at West Los Angeles College, ClassTrack is being piloted. The program looks
over several years of class enrollments and scheduling to help with planning
procedures.
- S. Morales offered to request for someone from West to give a demonstration
of ClassTrack on this campus.
- D. Beaulieu stated that it would be effective if the District took the lead
to better organize remediation efforts. He shared with the committee that
Sylvia Scott-Hayes thinks that there is a lack of faculty buy-in for
remediation, whereas faculty thinks there is a lack of administrative
leadership on the issue. It would be helpful for Sylvia Scott-Hayes to know
that there is a large faction of faculty on campus interested in this issue.
V STUDENT PREPARATION:
D. Ornelas reported that 22 Personal Development courses will be offered this
year (six in the summer, 7 at Southgate, 2 in career planning). Counseling will
take the lead in teaching these courses. There is also interest to work with
Matriculation to piggyback Personal Development courses with Basic Skills
(specifically English 21). D. Ornelas also stated that the following counselors
would be involved in the campus Remediation Committee: Keith Hayashi, Paulina
Palomino, and himself. R. Martinez reported that the Technology Plan has not
yet met to discuss creating an official proposal to EBPAC for more funding. She
further reported that ELAC has hired a new provisional manager who will assist
in identifying technicians’ skills and to make recommendations of what else is
needed. She also reported that the District is performing another survey on all
the colleges’ lab managers, computers, etc.
VI. STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: A. Samad
presented SLO implementation and task-management work plans (approximately
14-month timeline) to coordinate a campus-wide approach to SLOs, incorporating
them into Program Review and preparation for Accreditation. After studying
various other district strategies, noticing differing campus-wide approaches,
he devised a bottom-up approach for ELAC. Tasks include developing a mission
statement, educating faculty on SLOs, creating workshops to train faculty,
forming an SLO committee etc. He emphasized that the college must take into
consideration how measuring SLOs would differ from one department to the next.
- R. Moyer announced the vacancy of the Associate Dean of Research which, when
filled, will work hand in hand with the development of SLOs.
- M. Elena-Yepes asked how listing SLOs may affect course outlines and
syllabi.
- K. Daar responded that the course outline is a communication to the
instructor of what needs to be covered in class, whereas the syllabus is a
communication to the students of what they are expected to learn and be able to
do once they finish the course, therefore SLOs, to her, should be placed in the
instructors’ syllabi and a Department’s Program Review.
- R. Martinez stated that each college has different approaches--some do
incorporate SLOs in their course outlines, others in Program Review, etc.
- D. Beaulieu stated that a distinction needs to be maintained, regarding SLOs,
between the quantitative and the qualitative. He cautioned the committee of
potential dissonance and faculty resistance if the college is not careful on
how implementation of SLOs is presented to the faculty. If they are treated as
part of Program Review, they will be viewed as a departmental collaborative.
However, if they focus on class assessment, they may be construed as a part of
an instructor’s evaluation.
- R Martinez replied that SLOs should be viewed as a part of student success.
- g. A. Samad emphasized that a committee should be formed and a broad discussion
on SLOs is needed, perhaps on Opening Day next semester, to marginalize any
potential conflict on the topic.
Meeting adjourned 3:35 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted
Karen Daar
EPSC Co-chair
|